Matthew Katzman Wiki
Matthew Katzman Biography
Who is Matthew Katzman?
The Oxford University student who led a vote to remove the portrait of Queen Elizabeth II, sparking outrage at the highest levels of the UK government, is a wealthy American private school boy who is a fan of Captain America. , as it became known Wednesday.
Stanford graduate Matthew Katzman, 25, moved to remove the image from Magdalen’s central common room, saying it was unwelcoming because the monarch “represents recent colonial history.”
Members of the Common Media Chamber then voted in favor by a “substantial” majority, prompting a fierce reaction.
The Queen “is the head of state and a symbol of the best of the UK,” tweeted UK Secretary of Education Gavin Williamson. “During her long reign, she has worked tirelessly to promote British values of tolerance, inclusion and respect around the world.”
How old is Matthew Katzman?
He is 25 year old.
A spokesman for Boris Johnson told the Daily Mail that the prime minister “supports” his minister’s statement.
Now it has emerged that the man who led the movement to remove the portrait was not even British, but rather from Washington, DC, adding to the disruption.Katzman is the son of business attorney Scott Katzman, 65, who lives in a DC mansion valued at more than $ 5.5 million, according to the Mail.
He previously attended the $ 48,000-a-year Sidwell Friends School, a historic private Quaker college, where the Mail says he “probably” counted former President Barack Obama’s 22-year-old daughter, Malia, as a contemporary.
His younger sister, Sasha, also went there, as did Nancy Reagan, Chelsea Clinton, President Biden’s grandchildren, and the children of other Presidents, including Theodore Roosevelt and Richard Nixon.
His total education has cost at least $ 640,000, according to Mail.
Captain America shield, alongside the Stars and Stripes.
Katzman is also seen in photos on social media with a Captain America shield, alongside the stars and stripes.
But the computer science scholar insisted to the media that removing the portrait does not “amount to a statement about the Queen.”
“The royal family is on display in many areas of the university, and it was finally agreed that it was an unnecessary addition to the common room,” he said.
“It was decided that the room should be a welcoming and neutral place for all members, regardless of their background, demographics or views,” he said.
Matthew Katzman said that “The royal family is on display in many areas”
“No position was taken on the queen or the royal family; the conclusion was simply that there were better places to hang this print,” he said.
Magdalen College, which has distanced itself from voting, has long been “solidly realistic,” with its famous alumni, including King Edward VIII and the Queen herself, earning an honorary degree in 1948.
The monarch also visited in 2008 to commemorate her 550th anniversary.
The rector of Oxford University said he hopes the decision to remove the portrait “will not do too much damage” to the reputation of the university.
Magdalen College President Dinah Rose emphasized online that the students “do not represent the University,” while she emphasized that she “strongly supports free speech and political debate.”
“The photo will be stored safely,” she said.
Lord Chris Patten, vice chancellor of Oxford University, said he hopes the scandal “will not do too much damage to the reputation of the university.”
“Free speech allows even intelligent people to be offensive and obnoxiously ignorant,” he said, according to the Mail.
But Sir John Hayes, chairman of a group of common sense MPs, said those “involved should be completely ashamed of themselves.”