Home » Who is Jacob Talbot-Lummis?(Jacob Talbot-Lummis: Boy, 16, sentenced for shooting 15-year-old in face at close range as he walked to school ) Wiki, Bio, Age,Custody,Family,Facebook,Shooting,Victim, Instagram, Twitter & Quick Facts
Top Stories Trending News UK News USA USA News World News

Who is Jacob Talbot-Lummis?(Jacob Talbot-Lummis: Boy, 16, sentenced for shooting 15-year-old in face at close range as he walked to school ) Wiki, Bio, Age,Custody,Family,Facebook,Shooting,Victim, Instagram, Twitter & Quick Facts

Jacob Talbot-Lummis

Jacob Talbot-Lummis Wiki

                              Jacob Talbot-Lummis Biography

Who is Jacob Talbot-Lummis ?

A teenager who shot a 15-year-old boy in the face point-blank while walking to school was sentenced to 24 years in prison for his attempted murder.

Jacob Talbot-Lummis, 16, wounded his victim, who was aged 15 at the time, as he was leaving home for school in Kesgrave, Suffolk, on 7 September 2020.

The victim, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, was attacked by Jacob Talbot-Lummis in Kesgrave, near Ipswich in Suffolk, on 7 September last year.

Shooting

Talbot-Lummis, who was also 15 years old at the time of the shooting, may be named after Judge Martyn Levett lifted an information restriction that had barred his identification.

The 16-year-old defendant, who was obsessed with guns and violent computer games, “ruthlessly executed” his plan to attack his victim, the judge told Ipswich Crown Court.

Police officers conducted a search on Friends Walk, Kesgrave, Suffolk after the shooting
He shot the boy with a double-barreled shotgun from less than 5 feet (1.5 meters) away, on what was the opening day back to school after the first national lockdown.

In an earlier trial, Talbot-Lummis took his father’s car to drive to the scene and waited for the boy for more than an hour before shooting him with his grandfather’s Beretta.

The judge said the victim suffered “unimaginably serious injuries”, still suffers from flashbacks and remains “dependent on his family.”

One of the pieces was seen on a bench in Gorleston.

“The killing intent was not formed suddenly,” she said.

“All of this was planned and thought out in advance.”

The judge said Talbot-Lummis had played computer games “obsessively” since he was nine years old, “playing in a virtual world more suited to 18-year-olds.”

He said that playing such games “was a factor in the emergence of violent fantasies that he had,” and the judge expressed concern about “the frequent glorification of shooting a character on screen.”Diana Ellis QC, mitigating, said that Talbot-Lummis has “expressed her regret and remorse” for her.

Talbot-Lummis himself said as evidence that he wanted to “scare” the boy who had caused him “humiliation and fear” and claimed that he unintentionally fired the gun.

But jurors rejected his version and found him guilty in June of attempted murder.

The defendant was also found guilty of possession of a shotgun with the intent to endanger the life of the child and possession of a shotgun with the intent to cause fear of hurting him.

Custody

The judge said he had “the protection of the public in mind” when he imposed the extended sentence, which includes 24 years of custody and five years of leave.

Addressing the defendant, he said: “That sentence will affect you until you are 45 years old.”

‘Violent fantasies’

The court heard that Talbot-Lummis was obsessed with guns and violent computer games.

Judge Levett said the defendant had played a virtual reality computer game called Blood Trail the day before the shooting.

A friend of the defendant said the game was “hyper-realistic in its violence” and that Talbot-Lummis “adores it.”

The judge told the defendant: “You had this obsessive interest in all kinds of firearms and you had become entrenched in watching online computer games.”

Talbot-Lummis had been “playing in a virtual world more suited to 18-year-olds,” the judge added.

He said that playing these types of games “was a factor in the appearance of violent fantasies that he had.”

Family

The judge said Talbot-Lummis had “mercilessly executed” his plan to attack his victim, who suffered “unimaginably serious injuries”, still had memories and was “still dependent on his family.”

“The intention to kill was not formed suddenly,” the judge said.

Also Read: Who is Brianna Fruean?My day at COP26: ‘I told world leaders

Victim

Speaking after sentencing, Suffolk Police Det Supt David Henderson said: “I have no doubt that Jacob Talbot-Lummis intended to kill the victim.”

The court had heard that Talbot-Lummis had a “loot” of air pistols in his bedroom, and Det Supt Henderson said the boy “had experience using shotguns, so his claim that the gun was accidentally shot seems extremely unlikely. ”

“Witness descriptions of his cool and calm manner after the shooting seem to reaffirm that firing the shotgun was really planned,” he said.

“He didn’t check on the victim or try to ask for help; he just coldly walked away, his plan was carried out.

“Throughout the trial, he continued in this brazen and unflappable manner and has never shown remorse or concern for the victim.”

Talbot-Lummis was told that on his release from custody he would spend five more years on the license.

About the author

ibrarhussain

Ibrar Hussain is Verified. and most Senior U.S. Wiki and Biography profile creator Reporter on wikisoon.com. wikifoxnews and other authors Like as wikiaboutworld.com are also following him to create post on their websites.

Sponsored Links