Emily Hunt Wiki
Emily Hunt Biography
Emily Hunt, a woman who couldn’t be charged with the man who filmed her n * ked without her consent, won a five-year battle for justice. Prosecutors said they would reconsider the case.Emily Hunt claims to have been raped in May 2015Emily Hunt, who claims to have been raped in May 2015, woke up naked in a London hotel bed next to a man she supposedly had never seen.
How old is Emily Hunt?
The 40-year-old, who says her last memory was having lunch with a relative at a local restaurant five hours ago, felt she had been drugged and also suspected that she was raped.
The man was arrested on rape charges in 2015, but denied the allegations and was not charged with lack of evidence.
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has now stated that its decision not to prosecute the man who filmed Ms. Hunt n * ked without her consent must be reassessed.
Ms. Hunt said police had conducted a “very bad investigation” into her allegations and did not learn of the nude video of her until just over a year after the alleged incident.
Her alleged attacker recorded a video that lasted more than a minute and showed her lying naked and unconscious in the hotel bed to “masturbate after” her.
“The CPS treated me inhumanely from start to finish,” Ms. Hunt told The Independent. “I was diagnosed with PTSD. I had a breakdown. It has completely derailed the last five years of my life. If only the CPS had handled it right from the start. I hope they charge for it. He could go to jail for voyeurism, up to two years, and then he could be put on the s*x offender registry because he belongs there.
Emily Hunt had the political support of all parties.
Ms. Hunt, who has had the political support of all parties, added: “Today we are all safer. Today we know that what happened to me is undoubtedly illegal. I hope that my attacker can finally, now, almost five years later, see justice and the consequences of his actions.
“It took me almost five years to fight to get there. You don’t need relationships, education, or wealth to get justice. That decision was the clear, obvious and reasonable answer to a question that no one else asked: is it illegal to film a n * ked person without their consent? Because the answer is obvious: yes, yes. And today the court said yes.
Although the attacker admitted that the video was recorded without consent and for the purpose of his own s*xual gratification, the CPS refused to pursue voyeurism under the S*xual Offenses Act.
It is illegal to view or record someone performing a private act for the purpose of s*xual gratification without their consent. This is known as voyeurism and can be punished for up to two years. Detention.
Emily Hunt represented by the Women’s Justice Center
Ms. Hunt, who is represented by the Women’s Justice Center and who has launched a mob justice campaign to raise funds for legal proceedings, opened a judicial review last June and her case must be heard in court on next Thursday.
But last week she learned that the CPS, which said there was no reason to be prosecuted in Ms. Hunt’s case, would argue the opposite opinion in the appellate court in a case that focuses on the same issue.
The court allowed Ms. Hunt to intervene in a case involving a man who secretly filmed himself having sex with two women who agreed to have s*x for money but did not agree to be filmed.
“It is against logic for us as taxpayers to fund them to pass two very opposite sides of the same law,” Hunt said. “Today you read the ruling that it is illegal to film a n * ked person without your consent, even if you are in the same room and if you participate in consensual action.”
Harriet Wistrich, award-winning human rights attorney and director of the Center for Women’s Justice, argued that the PSK treated Ms. Hunt’s case in a “gruesome” manner and that it was hypocritical of her to argue two opposing points.
She added: “We would like to know why the PSK has argued points of conflict in two separate cases. As a publicly funded institution, they are obligated to act consistently and in the public interest. In the context of a significant reduction in the number of sex crimes prosecuted by the CPS, it is disappointing that they have limited resources to deal with cases on behalf of a whistleblower argument.