Home » Who is Dr Chris Rowland?(Millionaire financier, 65, fights ex-girlfriend, 60, for more compensation after judge ordered him to sell his £2.5m Cotswolds mansion ) Wiki, Bio, Age,Family,Facebook, Instagram, Twitter & Quick Facts
Celebrity Top Stories Trending News UK News USA USA News World News

Who is Dr Chris Rowland?(Millionaire financier, 65, fights ex-girlfriend, 60, for more compensation after judge ordered him to sell his £2.5m Cotswolds mansion ) Wiki, Bio, Age,Family,Facebook, Instagram, Twitter & Quick Facts

Dr Chris Rowland

Dr Chris Rowland Wiki

                                   Dr Chris Rowland Biography

Who is Dr Chris Rowland ?

A millionaire financier who was caught in bed with another woman is fighting with his ex-girlfriend in court for more compensation after a judge ruled that they must sell their £ 2.5 million weekend mansion and split the money.

Former financial analyst Dr. Chris Rowland, 65, purchased the nine-bedroom ‘Italian villa’ Tadmarton House, near Banbury, Oxfordshire, in 2009, with the intention of using it as a weekend country retreat with his partner Sharon Blades, 60 years old.

But in November of that year, their relationship fell apart after eco-business executive Ms. Blades discovered that Dr. Rowland had become engaged to another woman.

Dr Rowland, who once made an annual income of over £ 1 million, continued to see both brides for over a year until Blades surprised him and the other women together in his London attic bed in 2011.wikipedia

Ms Blades, who had issued a ‘veto’ forbidding Dr Rowlands to visit Tadmarton House with her love rival, accepted a police warning for ‘assaulting’ another lover of hers by ‘ripping off her clothes bed ‘.

Dr Rowland, who has a Ph.D. in economics, received a restraining order preventing contact with any of the women for weeks, the High Court in London was informed.

Blades’ veto on Dr. Rowland’s weekend at Tadmarton House with her new partner had lasted until October 2015, when he too separated from her.

In 2020, Blades and Dr. Rowland disputed a court case over ownership of the mansion, and a judge ruled that they were equal owners and that it should be divided between them, despite Dr. Rowland paying the full price for the mansion itself. pocket of it.

A judge had awarded Dr Rowland £ 59,958 to compensate him for his exclusion from the house between 2009 and 2015, but Dr Rowland is now appealing the award, asking that the figure be increased to £ 216,199.

In court this week, his attorney Paul Dipre argued that Dr. Rowland was “effectively expelled for the weekends” and that Judge William Hansen had misjudged the loss he suffered.

Dr Chris Rowland and Sharon Blades had a row which resulted in complaints being made to the police

The court heard that Dr. Rowlands and Ms. Blades were delighted with the Grade II listed “large and elegant” field pile that sits within 24 acres.

According to Ms. Blades, they intended to “grow old together” there, and Dr. Rowland planned to grow elephant grass in the adjacent fields as a complementary activity.

Judge Hansen, who ruled on the property dispute in Superior Court last year, said Dr. Rowland continued to see both women after Blades discovered her flirting.

He added: ‘He then continued to see both of them for over a year, but in early 2011, Ms Blades unexpectedly came to her apartment and found him in bed with her new partner.

“There was an altercation that resulted in Ms. Blades accepting a police reprimand for assaulting the new couple and Dr. Rowland accepting a restraining order that prevented contact with any of the women for weeks.”

In court, Dr. Rowland admitted to continuing to see both women for several months and acknowledged that he “was not proud of that fact.”

“But I was emotionally attached to both women and each of them wanted me to choose between them, and I had real problems making that decision,” he told the court.

Dr. Rowland said that Ms. Blades’ vetoed ‘him and his new partner from visiting the country mansion and had even written to him saying,’ I’d rather you sell it and have nothing to risk it she go there.

‘It was” our ” place and, at the very least, I’d like to keep that memory, even if I don’t have it physically or can’t be there anymore. ”

In February of last year, Judge Hansen ruled against Dr. Rowland, who had insisted that he was the sole owner of Tadmarton House as he paid the full price out of his own pocket.

The judge said he and Ms Blades had jointly acquired the property, although he acknowledged: “ In a sense, the outcome is tough on Dr. Rowland, who contributed the entire purchase price to acquire a home. of countryside to be used as a weekend and vacation retreat by a couple who each had their own properties and who never saw fit to pool their resources. ‘

He decided that the property was owned by the couple equally and ordered that it be sold with the proceeds divided in half.

Jude Hansen also awarded Dr Rowland £ 59,958 to compensate for his exclusion “from the use of a jointly owned weekend holiday home from November 2009 to October 2015.”

Blades’ veto on Dr. Rowland’s weekend at Tadmarton House with her new partner had lasted until October 2015, when he too separated from her.

But Dr Rowland is now appealing the £ 59,958 award, asking Judge Milwyn Jarman QC to increase his compensation to what he says is a fairer figure of £ 216,199.

In court this week, his attorney Paul Dipre argued that Dr. Rowland was “effectively expelled over the weekends” and that Judge Hansen misjudged the loss he suffered.

Blades’ lawyers say his ex’s compensation should be calculated based on his “loss of enjoyment”

But Blades’ lawyers say his ex’s compensation should be calculated based on his “loss of enjoyment” of the weekend hole, rather than on the value of the vacation rental.

He wants the £ 59,958 awarded to Dr Rowland to be drastically reduced to £ 36,000.

“The loss of Dr. Rowland was not pecuniary,” said Thomas Roe, Ms. Blades’ QC.

‘Basically, it was the loss of the opportunity to enjoy the comforts of using the house on the weekends.

That comfort did not reside in the basic elements of the property, such as the roof over the occupants’ heads, the kitchen for cooking and the bedrooms for sleeping, etc.

Dr. Rowland already had those things in his own home. What he lost was the special amenity, the special pleasure that he got from spending time at Tadmarton House. Properly analyzed, filed and presented, Dr. Rowland’s claim was a claim for loss of enjoyment. ‘

After hearing the appeal case for half a day, Judge Jarman said he would render his decision at a later date.

Dr Chris Rowland Quick and Facts

  • Dr Chris Rowland, 65, bought nine-bedroom ‘Italianate villa’ Tadmarton House
  • He planned to use it as a country retreat with partner Sharon Blades, 60
  • Ms Blades discovered him in bed with another woman in his London penthouse 
  • In 2020 Ms Blades and Dr Rowland fought a court case over ownership of the mansion; a judge ruled they were equal owners despite Dr Rowland paying for it
  • A judge awarded Dr Rowland £59,958 to compensate him for his exclusion from the house between 2009 and 2015
  • He is now appealing the award, asking for the figure to be increased to £216,199 

Sponsored Links