Ahmad Al Issa Wiki
Ahmad Al Issa Biography
Six days later, 21-year-old Ahmad Al Issa carried out a 20-minute shooting inside a King Soopers grocery store on Monday afternoon, killing 10 people with what witnesses described as an AR-15-style rifle.
Authorities have not confirmed which weapon was used, so it is unclear whether it would have been covered by the ban that the Boulder Police Department stopped enforcing after Hartman’s ruling.
The Boulder attack marked the seventh mass shooting in the U.S. in the span of a single week, and it came just six days after eight people were killed by a gunman who attacked three spas in Atlanta on December 16. March.
The recent series of shootings has reignited America’s debate over gun control after 2020 saw the lowest number of mass shootings in more than a decade as the coronavirus pandemic sent much of the country to the ground. blocking.
How old is Ahmad Al Issa?
21 years old
Boulder passed its two ordinances banning possession of assault-style rifles and large capacity magazines
Boulder passed its two ordinances prohibiting the possession of assault rifles and large-capacity magazines in the wake of the Parkland shooting in 2018, which left 17 people dead at Marjorie Stoneman High School in Florida.
The gun ban applied to certain semi-automatic pistols and rifles with pistol grips, a folding or telescopic stock, or any protruding grip that allows a weapon to be stabilized with the non-firing hand, according to the Denver Post. Large capacity magazines were defined as “any ammunition feeding device capable of accepting more than 10 rounds”.
The city council created a permit system to allow anyone to keep a weapon on the prohibited list if they possessed it prior to the ordinance.
Anyone found to be in violation of the ordinance was subject to up to 90 days in jail and fines of up to $ 1,000.
Gunman, 21, with ‘AR-15 style’ rifle shoots and kills …
The police father of seven, 51, killed in the Boulder massacre wanted a …
Boulder County District Court Judge Andrew Hartman (pictured) ruled March 12 that the city’s two-year bans on assault weapons and large-capacity magazines violated a 2003 state law that prohibits municipalities from promulgating their own firearms regulations.
Gun advocates quickly sued for the bans to be lifted, filing cases at both the local and federal levels.
The lawsuit that led to Hartman’s decision was brought by two Boulder residents and two pro-gun groups, the Colorado State Shooting Association and Gunsport of Colorado, who argued that it violated a state law that said the regulation Arms should be left to the state and federal government, not local legislators.
‘A local government cannot enact an ordinance, regulation, or other law that prohibits the sale, purchase, or possession of a firearm that a person may legally sell, buy, or possess under state or federal law,’ says the law enacted in 2003.
“The inconsistency between local governments of laws regulating the possession and ownership of firearms results in people being treated differently under the law based solely on their place of residence.”
Lawyers for the city argued that the council had the right to pass its own ordinances because it is a municipality of ‘autonomy’, meaning it can enact laws without explicit permission from the state.
They also argued that the bans were necessary because there are no adequate rules on assault weapons and large capacity magazines at the state level.
Boulder spokeswoman Shannon Aulabaugh last week told the Denver Post that the city’s
Boulder spokeswoman Shannon Aulabaugh told the Denver Post last week that city attorneys planned to meet with outside attorneys to discuss the possibility of appealing Hartman’s decision.
Gun control advocates condemned the ruling and called for repealing the 2003 law on which it was based.
They also noted that a similar assault weapons ban was allowed to remain in place in Denver despite state law.
The city of Denver sued the state over the 2003 law, arguing it was unconstitutional because it violated the rights of self-governing municipalities to pass their own ordinances.
The Denver District Court ruled that the city could uphold its ban because it had unique circumstances, including increased use of assault weapons and a rising murder rate.
The court also noted that Denver’s ban had been in place for years, since 1989.
The state appealed the ruling and it was upheld by a 3-3 split vote in the Colorado Supreme Court after a judge abstained from issuing the ruling.
Because the court did not reach a majority, the ruling did not set a precedent for whether other municipalities, such as Boulder, could preempt state law.
Experts say Hartman’s decision could send the matter back to the Colorado Supreme Court if Boulder decides to appeal.